Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Acta Medica Bulgarica ; 50(2):10-19, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20244214

ABSTRACT

Compared to other respiratory viruses, the proportion of hospitalizations due to SARS-CoV-2 among children is relatively low. While severe illness is not common among children and young individuals, a particular type of severe condition called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) has been reported. The aim of this prospective cohort study, which followed a group of individuals under the age of 19, was to examine the characteristics of patients who had contracted SARS-CoV-2, including their coexisting medical conditions, clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, and outcomes. The study also aimed to investigate the features of children who met the WHO case definition of MIS-C, as well as those who required intensive care. A total of 270 patients were included between March 2020 and December 2021. The eligible criteria were individuals between 0-18 with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Infectious Disease Hospital "Prof. Ivan Kirov"in Sofia, Bulgaria. Nearly 76% of the patients were <= 12 years old. In our study, at least one comorbidity was reported in 28.1% of the cases, with obesity being the most common one (8.9%). Less than 5% of children were transferred to an intensive care unit. We observed a statistically significant difference in the age groups, with children between 5 and 12 years old having a higher likelihood of requiring intensive care compared to other age groups. The median values of PaO2 and SatO2 were higher among patients admitted to the standard ward, while the values of granulocytes and C-reactive protein were higher among those transferred to the intensive care unit. Additionally, we identified 26 children who met the WHO case definition for MIS-C. Our study data supports the evidence of milder COVID-19 in children and young individuals as compared to adults. Older age groups were associated with higher incidence of both MIS-C and ICU admissions.Copyright © 2023 P. Velikov et al., published by Sciendo.

2.
Siberian Medical Review ; 2022(3):40-48, 2022.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20239032

ABSTRACT

The aim of the research. To study clinical and laboratory features of the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in order to develop a model that would allow, taking the publicly available research methods into account, to carry out early diagnosis of severe community-acquired pneumonia against the background of the new coronavirus infection. Material and methods. A total of 82 COVID-19 patients who complied with inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Depending on the clinical severity, three study groups were formed: group 1 included 13 patients with uncomplicated COVID-19, group 2 consisted of 39 patients with non-severe forms of pneumonia that developed against COVID-19 and group 3 was comprised of 30 patients with COVID-19 complicated by severe pneumonia. The groups were comparable in age and gender. All patients underwent general clinical examination, laboratory tests, including general and biochemical blood analysis, as well as chest computed tomography. Results. The clinical picture in COVID-19 patients differed depending on the disease severity. Coughing and shortness of breath were more often observed in patients with severe pneumonia;sore throat, on the contrary, was more often noted in patients with uncomplicated COVID-19. On admission to the inpatient facility, patients with severe pneumonia had higher body temperature and respiratory rate, with simultaneous decrease in blood oxygen saturation. One half of the patients with severe pneumonia had hypertensive disease in medical history, and one third had ischaemic heart disease. As a rule, uncomplicated COVID-19 patients did not have ischaemic heart disease. It was found through laboratory analysis of blood that groups of patients significantly differed in the levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils and eosinophils. Conclusion. The use of such clinical and laboratory data as acute respiratory failure, fever, the levels of neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, eosinophils and basophils makes it possible to identify patients with more severe pneumonia against the background of COVID-19 even before chest computed tomography. Key words:.Copyright © 2022, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University. All rights reserved.

3.
Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology ; 30(9):e178-e186, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-20233238

ABSTRACT

Background: At our hospital, people with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) had a high rate of pulmonary barotrauma. Therefore, the current study looked at barotrauma in COVID-19 patients getting invasive and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to assess its prevalence, clinical results, and features. Methodology: Our retrospective cohort study comprised of adult COVID-19 pneumonia patients who visited our tertiary care hospital between April 2020 and September 2021 and developed barotrauma. Result(s): Sixty-eight patients were included in this study. Subcutaneous emphysema was the most frequent type of barotrauma, reported at 67.6%;pneumomediastinum, reported at 61.8%;pneumothorax, reported at 47.1%. The most frequent device associated with barotrauma was CPAP (51.5%). Among the 68 patients, 27.9% were discharged without supplemental oxygen, while 4.4% were discharged on oxygen. 76.5% of the patients expired because of COVID pneumonia and its complications. In addition, 38.2% of the patients required invasive mechanical breathing, and 77.9% of the patients were admitted to the ICU. Conclusion(s): Barotrauma in COVID-19 can pose a serious risk factor leading to mortality. Also, using CPAP was linked to a higher risk of barotrauma.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.

4.
Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training ; 11(4):38-46, 2022.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2326915

ABSTRACT

Patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis have one of the highest COVID-19 mortality rates. The use of innovative methods capable of optimizing their treatment outcomes is important for clinical practice. Aims - to investigate the efficacy and safety of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in COVID-19 patients treated with hemodialysis. Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective controlled single-center study with 102 COVID-19 patients on maintenance hemodialysis involved (M: 67;65.7%;W: 35;34.3%), aged 57.2+/-15.3 years. PCR-detected SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed in all patients. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies were administered to 69 patients, who formed the study group (group 1). The control group included 33 patients (group 2). The combination of bamlanevimab and etesevimab was the most frequent therapy used (in 59 patients). Results. In the course of the disease, group 1 patients, compared to those of group 2, had statistically significantly higher blood oxygen saturation values (94.2+/-5.7 vs 89.8+/-10.7);they required less frequent oxygen support (29.0 vs 54.5%) and ICU treatment (18.8 vs 48.5%), respectively. Fatal outcomes occurred in 4 (5.8%) of 69 patients who received neutralizing antibodies and in 6 (18.2%) of 33 patients who did not receive the therapy, p<0.05. Except for one patient, all other patients in both groups developed an unfavorable outcome due to progressive lung damage. However, only 4 of 6 (2/3) patients with progressive lung damage died in group 1, whereas the similar course of the disease proved fatal in all cases in group 2. Conclusion. The use of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in hemodialysis patients is safe and effective when the drugs are administered early, the pulmonary process progression is insignificant and dominant SARSCoV-2 variants are sensitive to them.Copyright © 2022 Tomsk Polytechnic University, Publishing House. All rights reserved.

5.
International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism ; 21(2) (no pagination), 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2317868

ABSTRACT

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread quickly. Comorbidities, such as diabetes, have been determined as critical risk factors for COVID-19. Objective(s): This study aimed to determine the frequency and severity of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in children before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): This retrospective study examined children aged less than 18 years diagnosed with DKA hospitalized in Yazd Shahid Sadoughi Hospital from February 20, 2020, to November 21, 2021. The collected information was compared to those obtained during the same period in 2019 (pre-pandemic). According to the inclusion criteria, only children with suspected symptoms of COVID-19 or an infected family member underwent PCR. Result(s): The study included 70 children with confirmed DKA during the COVID-19 pandemic and 33 children hospitalized during the pre-pandemic period. The findings showed that the rate of DKA was higher during the pandemic than in the pre-pandemic period. In the DKA subgroups (during the COVID-19 pandemic vs. pre-pandemic), 35.7% vs. 21.2% were severe, 37.1% vs. 36.4% were moderate, and 27.1% vs. 42.4% were mild. Of 70 children, 30 underwent PCR tests for COVID-19, showing six positive cases. Among positive cases, five had mild symptoms, while one was hospitalized with signs of respiratory distress, polyuria, and polydipsia. All physical examinations of this patient were normal, except for the chest exam. Conclusion(s): A remarkable increase was observed in the frequency and severity of DKA in children during the pandemic.Copyright © 2023, International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

6.
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae ; 28(11):125-131, 2022.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2315759

ABSTRACT

Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of Fuzheng Huayu tabletsFHTfor treating pulmonary inflammation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019COVID-19. Method(s):A total of 704 cases were lost to follow-up, and 66 cases were finally completedCOVID-19 patients were recruited from February 1 to April 15 in 2020. They were assigned to a control group35 patientsand a FHT group31 patients. The patients in the control group received routine treatment alone and those in the FHT group received FHT in addition to routine treatment. The primary outcome was the ratio of patients showing improvement in chest computed tomographic manifestations after 14 days. The secondary outcome measures included remission rate or progression rate of critical illness,clinical remission rate of respiratory symptoms,routine blood examination, C-reactive proteinCPRlevel,procalcitoninPCTlevel,and blood oxygen saturationSPO2 . The safety was assessed based on liver and kidney functions and adverse events. Result(s): After the 14-day treatment,the ratio of patients showing improvement in the FHT group100%was higher than that in the control group 77.1%chi2 =8.063,P<0.01. The ratio of disease stages after treatment showed no significant difference between two groups. In the FHT group,the symptoms including cough,dyspnea,and fatigue were alleviated after treatmentP<0.01. In the control group,the symptoms including fever,cough,and dyspnea were alleviatedP<0.01,while the fatigue was not relieved after treatment. No significant difference was observed in the clinical symptoms between the two groups after treatment. After treatment,the FHT group showed decreased white blood cellWBCcount and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioNLRP<0.01,elevated plateletPLTlevelP<0.05,lowered CRP levelP<0.05,and no significant difference in lymphocyte LYM,hemoglobinHb,SPO2 or PCT level. The control group showed decreased NLRP<0.05and WBC countP<0.01,elevated PCT levelP<0.05,and no significant change in LYM,Hb,PLT,SPO2 or CRP level after treatment. Furthermore,the FHT group had higher PLT level than the control groupP<0.05after treatment,and other indicators had no significant differences between the two groups. The liver and kidney functions had no significant difference between the two groups after treatment. Conclusion(s): FHT can safely promote the absorption of acute pulmonary inflammation in COVID-19 patients.Copyright © 2022, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Institute of Chinese Materia Medica. All rights reserved.

7.
Eksperimental'naya i Klinicheskaya Farmakologiya ; 86(2):18-27, 2023.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2312974

ABSTRACT

Clinical parameters characterizing the efficacy and safety of favipiravir were examined in a multicenter, non-interventional (before-and-after study design) trial in 264 patients with mild COVID-19. It is shown that on the background of 14-day therapy with favipiravir body temperature normalized, blood oxygen saturation improved, and the frequency of tachycardia detection reduced by 16% (p < 0.0001). A statistically significant decrease by 91,3% (p 0.0001) in the frequency of SARS-nCoV-2 RNA detection in the nasopharyngeal mucosa discharge was revealed. A decrease in the concentration of ferritin (by 69% compared to initial values), blood glucose (by 21%), creatinine (by 10%), C-reactive protein (by 36%) (p 0.0001), and D-dimer by 61% (p = 0.016) was noted. The results of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire revealed a significant (p 0.05) improvement in the quality of life in terms of physical functioning (by 35%), and role functioning associated with physical and emotional state by 107% and 160%, respectively. Analysis of the COV19-QoL questionnaire revealed a decrease by 24% in negative perception of the disease (p < 0,01). Among the identified adverse events, elevated level of ALT (in 39.47% of patients), hyperuricemia (in 28.95% of patients), and elevated AST (in 23.68% of patients) prevailed. All the adverse events occurred with mild or moderate severity. There were no lethal outcomes in the studied sample of patients. The analysis showed a satisfactory level of the tolerability of the treatment.Copyright © 2023 Izdatel'stvo Meditsina. All rights reserved.

8.
European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society International Congress, ERS ; 60(Supplement 66), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2270828

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of face masks in the public and at work became mandatory as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in many countries. Wearing masks under physical work or for a prolonged time may lead to complaints of labored breathing and increased stress. The influence of three types of masks on cardiopulmonary performance was investigated in a randomized cross-over design. Method(s): Forty volunteers (20 women, 19-65 years) underwent bodyplethysmography, spiroergometric and ergometric exercise tests without mask, with a surgical mask, a community mask and a FFP2 mask. Additionally, a 4hour mask wearing period was investigated during regular work (office or laboratory). Cardiopulmonary, physical, capnometric, and blood gas-related parameters were recorded. Result(s): Breathing resistance and work of breathing were increased when wearing a mask. During physical exercise minute ventilation was lower and the breathing cycle time was extended with mask. Wearing a mask caused minimal decreases in blood oxygen partial pressure (pO2) and oxygen saturation (sO2) and an initial slight rise in blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2) during exercise. All effects were most pronounced with FFP2. Temperature, humidity, and inspiratory CO2 concentration slightly increased behind the mask. No changes in pO2, sO2, and pCO2 were observed during the 4-hour wearing period at work. Conclusion(s): Wearing face masks at rest and under workload changed the breathing pattern in the sense of physiological compensation. Wearing a mask for 4 hours during light work had no effect on blood gases and no adverse effects were observed throughout all testing.

10.
Rawal Medical Journal ; 48(1):63-69, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2249033

ABSTRACT

Objective: To identify a novel biomarker with high prognostic value SII Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in the disease progression of COVID-19 patients with its cost effectiveness and less time consuming. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was carried out from November 2021 to February 2022 at the Mardan Medical Complex, Khyber Pakhtunkhwah, Pakistan. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to discover the ideal cut-off values for predictors for disease severity stage, i.e. asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, critical, based on their greatest Youden's index. The SII (platelet X neutrophil count/lymphocyte counts) formula was used to compute the systemic immune inflammation index. Result(s): Of the 311 cases studied, 233 were included;155 (66.52%) were male and 78 (33.47%) females. Median age was 38 years (IQR: 18 - 79). Patients had a significant increase in various blood parameters, with an increase in SII index between admission and hospitalization. Normal patients had a SII median 398 (IQR: 312 - 567) upon admission, while abnormal patients had a SII median 659 (IQR: 475 - 1540). Throughout hospitalization, SII index of asymptomatic patients median was 684 (IQR: 470 - 933);cut-off value >= 358, mild patients median 909 (IQR: 183 - 1930);cut-off value >= 501, moderate patients median >= 992 (IQR: 248 - 6099);cut-off value >= 903, severe patients median 1063 (IQR: 104 - 5014);cut-off value >= 1147, critical patients median 1230 (IQR: 100 - 8438);cut-off value >= 1481. Conclusion(s): SII was found to be a significant predictor of COVID-19 patients' severity progression to fatality as an independent prognostic factor. SII is being recommended as a low-cost and less time-consuming blood test for COVID-19 patients.Copyright © 2023, Pakistan Medical Association. All rights reserved.

11.
Index de Enfermeria ; 30(3):184-188, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1865876

ABSTRACT

Objective: To measure the effects of the prone position on ventilatory parame-ters in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory syndrome secondary to COVID-19. Methods: Through a descrip-tive, cross-sectional, prospective study, a sample of 103 patients with acute respira-tory syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19 was studied. The patients were placed in the prone position indefinitely and clinical ventilatory pa-rameters were monitored such as blood pressure oxygen (PaO2), oxygen saturation (SatO2) and relationship between partial pressure of oxy-gen and inspired fraction of oxygen (PaO2/FiO2). Results: The concentration of FiO2 decreased from 100% in the su-pine position to 69% in the prone position, the PaO2/FiO2 increased from 74 to 122 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), the basal PaO2 was recorded at 51 mmHg and after the change in position it was of 89 mmHg, also the SatO2 improved from 84% to 93%. Conclusions: The prone position can significantly improve the PaO2, SatO2 values, as well as the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and in general, the clinical status of the patient with ARDS.

12.
Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine ; 53(1), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1862184

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 pneumonia is responsible for the latest pandemics. Chest computed tomography (CT) scan is known to be an essential tool for diagnosis of COVID-19. In this research, the relationship between on-admission chest CT severity score, capillary blood oxygen saturation level, and laboratory inflammatory markers results in patients with SARS-COV-2 pneumonia was investigated. Methods: This prospective analytical study was conducted in COVID-19 isolation unit, Zagazig University Hospitals, from 1st to end of April 2021. Adult patients with COVID-19 infection were included. Chest CT scan was performed for all patients, and CT severity score was computed. The initial capillary oxygen saturation was also assessed at the time of admission. The information was gathered and analyzed. Results: A total number of 305 COVID-19 patients were involved in the study with the following data: age, gender, presence of co morbidities, capillary blood oxygen saturation, laboratory tests including absolute lymphocytic count, CRP, D-dimer and ferritin levels, as well as chest CT severity score. Based on chest CT severity score, we found that 110 cases (36.1%) were mild, 163 cases (53.4%) were moderate, and 32 cases (10.5%) were severe, with significant male predominance among moderate and severe cases. The initial measurements of blood oxygen saturation values revealed that mean blood oxygen saturation was 95.6% among mild to moderate cases and 85.4% among severe cases. Furthermore, there was a high statistically significant negative correlation between chest CT severity score and absolute lymphocytic count of studied cases, while there was a statistically significant positive correlation with D-dimer, CRP and ferritin levels. Conclusions: CT scans can help clinicians in developing a management strategy and serve as a predictor of illness severity and possible outcomes. In individuals with COVID-19 infection, the severity of a chest CT scan is positively correlated to inflammatory markers and oxygen demand.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL